Swissi AI Journal
The Swiss flag flying in front of a snow-covered mountain.

ISSN 3043-1921

Swissi AI Journal Open Access & Peer-Reviewed

Artificial intelligence research from method to deployed system. Editors assess the method, evaluation and evidence, then publish accepted work continuously with open access from its publication date.

Open access

Peer-Reviewed Swissi Articles

Show all Swissi articles

SAIJ-guex5c23zfm5Oct 2026

Multi-Agent AI as a Nested Principal-Agent Problem in Private Wealth Management

Mandate Representation and Evidence Control in Switzerland, Germany and Austria

DOI 10.5281/zenodo.23095194

arXiv 2610.02863

A nested client–manager–AI formulation specifies separate client and manager outcomes and a constrained joint objective. Analytical constructions and simulations examine how mandate representation, clarification and evidence-bound approval affect recommendations.

Keywords:
  • multi-agent AI
  • private wealth management
  • nested principal-agent
  • mandate representation
  • joint objective
  • specification risk
  • suitability
  • premise provenance
  • human oversight

SAIJ-5kdnql4rsq27Jul 2026

Multi-Jurisdictional Legal Identity Assurance for Capability Gating

A Design-Science Proposal for Tiered, Reusable Identity Assurance of Natural, Juridical, and Machine Entities

DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21901241

arXiv 2610.00287

Flat maximum verification charges every participant for the rarest high-risk case, and excludes those who cannot clear a bar they never needed to. This model holds the assurance state apart from the capability gate that consumes it, so identity demand follows the act and the weight of its consequences rather than mere presence.

Keywords:
  • identity assurance
  • capability gating
  • tiered and reusable verification
  • multi-jurisdictional identity
  • data minimisation
  • entity taxonomy
  • bitemporal reliance
  • design science research

SAIJ-zpd6gvtrfaunJul 2026

Credentials and Triangulated Trust Signals on a Single Accountable Identifier

A Hash-Anchored Distributed-Ledger Framework for Portable Identity across Jurisdictions

DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21901243

Digital identity stays rigid while it is bound to provider accounts, mutable handles and local wallet schemes. An accountable hash-anchor tier sits above them: an inert root anchor, unlinkable profile anchors for distinct contexts, and gate-specific assurance evaluated at a point in time.

Keywords:
  • digital identity
  • verifiable credentials
  • accountable pseudonymity
  • distributed ledger
  • selective disclosure
  • identity assurance
  • self-sovereign identity
  • hash anchor

SAIJ-sh27g6sykt2kJul 2026

Identity-Staked Consensus and Collusion Resistance in Chartered Validator Sets

A Trust Model for Decentralised and Compliant Distributed Settlement Infrastructure

DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21901245

Permissioned ledgers are commonly dismissed as centralised because admission is restricted. Separating permissioning from control distribution makes validator identity externally costly collateral: public legal identity, charter state, liability and audit exposure, with affiliation-aware voting caps and per-member collusion margins.

Keywords:
  • identity-staked consensus
  • permissioned ledger
  • proof-of-authority
  • validator trust model
  • collusion resistance
  • settlement infrastructure
  • actor assurance
  • threshold class coverage
  • ledger evidence record

SAIJ-f3jtignfyge3May 2026

Firm Valuation When AI Shapes the Business Model

A Milestone-Based Real-Options Framework for the AI Valuation Uncertainty Problem

DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21901247

arXiv 2609.24181

Discounted cash flow, the IDW S 1 income approach and market multiples compress milestone probabilities, continuation options and risk shifts into opaque aggregate parameters. A milestone-gated real-options overlay decomposes that value into auditable components, with a Success Readiness Index deriving per-option probabilities from structured pairwise comparisons.

Keywords:
  • firm valuation
  • AI integration
  • real options
  • milestone-based valuation
  • intangible assets
  • AHP
  • multi-criteria decision analysis

SAIJ-cwo7xrcdsautMar 2026

Functional Architecture of European Electricity Trading Markets

Requirements for AI Supported Trading Systems under Regulatory Constraints

DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21901249

arXiv 2609.29108

European electricity trading runs as a constrained multi-layer system in which legal design, exchange microstructure and network physics execute jointly across forward, day-ahead, intraday and balancing horizons. The paper specifies an AI-supported trading architecture with a permission gate on executable actions and fail-closed control logic under REMIT, MiFID II, MiFIR and EMIR.

Keywords:
  • EU electricity market
  • market coupling
  • NEMO topology
  • electricity balancing
  • AI trading systems
  • compliance-by-design

SAIJ-xz3bi3q7fwimAug 2025

Compliant AI Infrastructure for Regulated Finance

A tiered multi-agent framework with DLT audit trails for financial operations in DACH

DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21901251

arXiv 2609.27632

Regulation is treated as an orientation layer rather than a deterministic ruleset: a matrix of regulatory intent and exposure is compiled into concrete prohibitions, obligations and runtime budgets. Evidence, decisions and reason codes bind to a permissioned DAG, so a supervisor can replay how an outcome was reached and attribute failure.

Keywords:
  • DACH finance
  • regulated financial institutions
  • multi agent expert system
  • policy compiled orchestration
  • objective under constraints
  • permissioned DLT
  • DAG timestamping
  • audit trails
  • EU AI Act
  • MiFID II
  • DORA
  • GDPR
  • human oversight
  • execution gating
  • ESG budgets
  • verification and assurance

SAIJ-ddkjais6s332Aug 2025

A regulatory-compliant AI and verification system for higher education under ESG-aligned constraints

DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21901253

Two linked components for higher education: a role-specific multi-agent framework for institutional operations, and a decentralised verification layer for audit, credential authentication and tamper-evident records. GDPR, the EU AI Act, EQF, ECTS and ESG directives are encoded as structural constraints rather than checked after the fact.

Keywords:
  • Regulatory technology
  • artificial intelligence in education
  • multi-agent AI systems
  • decentralised verification
  • academic tokenisation
  • GDPR compliance
  • EU AI Act
  • digital credential infrastructure
  • ESG governance
  • UniAI
  • UniDVS

SAIJ-zkihhbpahsbrAug 2025

Verifiable Federated AI Infrastructure

Swiss compliant federated AI DLT network using Nash equilibrium and ESG metrics

DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21901255

Centralised AI infrastructure scales, and collides with latency, auditability and energy constraints. The design separates centralised training from decentralised inference and storage across five node classes, tying a size-neutral availability floor to tiered rewards for service level, ESG performance and anti-concentration.

Keywords:
  • decentralised data centre
  • AI
  • Federated AI infrastructure
  • ESG
  • ESG-aware compute
  • Nash equilibrium
  • digital sovereignty
  • Swiss data regulation
  • tokenised infrastructure
  • verifiable AI services

SAIJ-soeptiqyucowAug 2025

Generic AI-DLT Enterprise System

Architecture and methodology for scalable domain adaptation from a unified core framework

DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21901257

Compliance in AI deployments is usually applied afterwards, through prompt engineering, rather than built into the foundation. This architecture encodes regulatory, governance and ESG requirements as an objective-under-constraints problem, so every specialised agent operates within legally admissible and auditable bounds before any domain work begins.

Keywords:
  • Compliance-first AI
  • Multi-agent systems
  • Distributed ledger technology
  • Directed acyclic graph
  • Regulation by design
  • ESG integration
  • Domain-agnostic architecture
  • Deployment-agnostic architecture
  • Vendor-agnostic architecture
  • Objective-under-constraints

Standing calls

Current calls for papers

Standing calls identify current editorial priorities within the journal's full scope.

SustainabilityArtificial intelligence and ESG evidence
Results that cost less compute to obtain, artificial intelligence applied to generation and grids, and sustainability reporting treated as a question of evidence.
SovereigntyEnterprise AI under European compliance
Systems that run inside the jurisdiction: self-hosted or European inference, data governed within its required location, and measured capability and financial costs.
LanguageFoundation models for the DACH region
Models trained, adapted and evaluated on German-language material, with benchmarks that exist in German, and a clear account of where a regional model outperforms a general one.

From arXiv

Recent arXiv Articles

arXiv cs.AI

Modeling and Understanding Neural Weights of Humanoid Policies with Diffusion

Recent advances in robot learning have driven rapid progress in humanoid control, enabling increasingly agile behaviors in the real world. However, humanoid control networks are typically obtained through conventional training procedures, while comparatively little attention has been given to directly modeling the...

arXiv cs.LG

Lotus: Learning to Understand Time-series by Learning to Forecast

Time-series language models typically align numerical signals with language using labels, captions, or question-answer pairs. Although such supervision encourages linguistic representations, it does not explicitly require them to preserve information about how the underlying time-series signal evolves. We introduce...

arXiv cs.AI

Hierarchical Residual Policy Learning for Real-World Mobile Manipulation with Sparse Human Guidance

Mobile Manipulation (MoMa) is a cornerstone of autonomous robotic systems, yet real-world fine-tuning remains a formidable challenge because of high-dimensional action spaces and intricate coupling between heterogeneous modules. In this paper, we propose HiRe-MoMa (Hierarchical Residual Mobile Manipulation), a...

arXiv cs.LG

Inverse Reasoning Models for Efficient Post-Training and Verification from Answer-Only Data

Post-training reasoning LLMs often requires making a tradeoff between costly supervision and compute inefficiency: supervised finetuning typically requires reasoning traces, which is data inefficient since in many applications one only has prompt-answer tuples and lacks the groundtruth chain-of-thought (CoT)...

arXiv cs.AI

Co-Evolving Acting and Forecasting for Language Agents

Training language agents is bottlenecked by the high cost of long-horizon rollouts, yet standard agentic reinforcement learning (RL) learns only from a terminal scalar reward, leaving the supervision in intermediate steps largely unused. Prior work exploits this supervision through value targets that estimate...

arXiv cs.LG

Do Vision CIL Methods Transfer to Protein? A Diagnostic Benchmark of Frozen Protein Encoders

Protein function annotation operates over an expanding label space, making class-incremental learning (CIL) a natural framework for incorporating newly discovered functions without full retraining. Yet existing CIL methods have been developed largely in vision and have not been systematically evaluated over frozen...

arXiv cs.AI

Your Transformer Is Secretly Elastic

Scaling up transformers has produced models with broad capabilities, deployed across heterogeneous hardware and fluctuating workloads. Yet, model families offer only a few fixed sizes (e.g., S, B, L), forcing users to commit to a model based on hardware and latency constraints. This rigidity is often suboptimal...

arXiv cs.LG

Do Perturbation Predictors Learn Gene Interactions? Diagnosing Extrapolation in Agentic Screening

High-throughput perturbation screens increasingly use machine-learning models to predict the effects of gene combinations that were never measured. A difficult case arises when both genes in a test pair were seen individually during training, but their combination was not. In this setting, standard OOD methods...

arXiv cs.AI

Price of Anarchy of First-Price Auctions in Agentic Markets

An agentic market is a decentralized serving-time market where AI agents bid to claim each user prompt. An agent's bid is based on its expected value for the prompt, which is the expectation of the reward for its response minus its inference costs. First-price auctions (FPAs), in which the highest bidder pays its...

arXiv cs.LG

Token Utility for On-Policy Distillation via Local Trust-Region Optimization

Token-selection methods for on-policy distillation (OPD) prioritize student-visited positions using diverse signals, including uncertainty, teacher-student disagreement, and mismatch direction. We instead derive token importance from the distillation objective itself: how much can each position's loss decrease...

arXiv cs.AI

Continuum Attention

We introduce Continuum Attention (CA), a causal Transformer attention operator that replaces discrete key and value lookup with integration over a continuous, piecewise linear memory curve. Each query induces an exponential relevance density along the curve. Integrating the density and interpolated values yields...

arXiv cs.LG

PMO-Dock: Benchmarking Docking, Specificity, and Generalization in Molecular Optimization

The Practical Molecular Optimization (PMO) benchmark standardized evaluation in molecular optimization, but it is built on simple property-based oracles that do not capture structure-based drug design. As the field has moved to docking-based objectives, evaluation practice has become unstandardized, and different...

arXiv cs.AI

Player-1: Learning to Play from Synthetic Experience

Computer-use agents have demonstrated strong capabilities in interpreting screens and executing keyboard and mouse actions. However, games, with their visually rich worlds and diverse mechanics, remain challenging and offer a demanding next step toward general digital control. Current game-agent learning pipelines...

arXiv cs.LG

Data Density Scaling Laws for Image Self-Distillation

Current scaling law formulations suggest that increasing the number of unique samples in a dataset improves model performance, while repeated exposure to the same samples provides diminishing value. In this work, we examine this assumption for image self-distillation models. Through systematic experiments across...

arXiv cs.AI

One Task, Many Interfaces: Simple Cross-Interface Consistency Training Improves LLM Agent Robustness

Post-training binds the competence of an LLM agent to the interface it was trained on. Semantics-preserving perturbations of that interface, such as renaming an action or changing the notation, leave the underlying task unchanged yet make the agent worse at it. Scoring each sample independently means interface...

arXiv cs.LG

Scaling Cheap Synthetic Pretraining Improves Indoor Radio-Map Prediction

Real measurements are too limited to train an accurate indoor pathloss predictor that works across a wide range of buildings. Large-scale synthetic pretraining offers a way forward, but real building layouts are also scarce, and accurate ray-tracing simulators are slow, expensive, and often proprietary. We address...

arXiv cs.AI

Beyond LLM Judge: Mechanical Verification for Agentic Autoformalization

We introduce a novel method for verifying Lean formalizations that goes beyond LLM-judged faithfulness. Unlike most verification methods, which rely on LLMs or trained models, our method combines LLM-based semantic review with mechanical numerical and vacuity checks, providing checkable feedback and detecting...

arXiv cs.LG

IR-PRM+ with Previous-Utility Prediction: Constant Regret and Best-Iterate Convergence

Regret matching (and its variants) and counterfactual regret minimization are central algorithms in practice for normal-form and extensive-form game solving. Yet these have historically lacked the stronger theoretical convergence guarantees available to optimistic and extra-gradient methods. Recent work introduced...

arXiv cs.AI

Recovering Reliable Supervision via Critique-Guided On-Policy Distillation

On-policy distillation (OPD) trains a student model on its own rollouts with token-level supervision from a teacher, assuming that the teacher can reach a correct answer from any prefix the student writes. We call this property the recoverability of the teacher and show it fails on incorrect rollouts: the teacher...

arXiv cs.LG

How Many Ranks Does a Token Need? A Noise-Floor Squelch for Rank-One LoRA Experts

Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) applies every rank-one component of its update to every token, and mixture-of-experts variants replace this with a learned router that activates a fixed number of components. We argue that the number of components a token needs is a detection question with a classical answer. A token's...

For authors

Submitting to the journal

Please submit your manuscript, in English or German, as either a LaTeX package or a PDF. Every submission is reviewed by the editors, and every author receives a reasoned response.

Charges
Submission is free. A single CHF 450 charge applies when a manuscript proceeds to external peer review.
Review
Manuscripts selected for peer review are assessed double-blind by at least 2 independent specialists outside the editorial team. Peer review is completed within 4 weeks of submission.

Authors

Research from academia and professional practice

The journal publishes work by researchers, doctoral candidates and practitioners in industry and public institutions. Every manuscript is assessed on its method, evidence and contribution.

Named authors take responsibility for the manuscript and record their individual contributions.

Institutions

Collaborative work across laboratories, companies and public bodies

The journal publishes collaborative research conducted across universities, laboratories, companies and public bodies. Evidence from systems in operation is central to its scope.

Named individuals hold authorship; institutions are recorded as affiliations on the published article.

Who decides

Editorial board

Editorial decisions are assigned by subject competence. Each manuscript selected for peer review is assessed double-blind by independent specialists. Reviewer identities remain confidential, and the responsible editor makes the final publication decision.

Editor-in-chief

Dr.Walter KurzMBA, M.Sc.

  • Enterprise AI architecture
  • Multi-agent AI systems
  • AI governance and regulatory compliance
  • AI in company valuation and risk
  • Distributed ledger infrastructure
  • Universität Graz
  • Universität Augsburg
  • FH CAMPUS 02
  • Swissi Institute for AI

Editorial board

Prof. Dr.Velimir Dedić

  • Computer and AI system security
  • Management information systems
  • Data analysis and applied statistics
  • IT security policy
  • E-learning and instructional design
  • FITI Belgrad (Faculty of Information Technology and Engineering)
  • BK University
  • IRRODL

Editorial board

Prof. Dr.Stefan Marx

  • Internal control systems
  • Statutory audit under HGB and IFRS
  • Corporate governance and compliance systems
  • Internal audit and special audits
  • Sustainability and ESG reporting
  • HfWU Nürtingen-Geislingen
  • Steinbeis-Beratungszentrum Corporate Governance und Wirtschaftsprüfung

Editorial board

Prof. Dr.Frank Reinhardt

  • Tax law
  • Banking regulation and supervision
  • Corporate governance and internal control
  • Compliance and risk management
  • HfWU Nürtingen-Geislingen
  • Steinbeis-Beratungszentrum Corporate Governance und Wirtschaftsprüfung

Editorial board

Prof. Dr.Jörg Westphal

  • AI adoption in sales organisations
  • Trust in AI systems
  • AI governance in organisations
  • AI-supported sales training
  • B2B sales management and enablement
  • FOM Hochschule
  • Helmut-Schmidt-Universität Hamburg
  • Universität Hamburg
  • DHBW Stuttgart
  • zfuw Koblenz
  • UCAM Murcia
  • Marketing Management Journal
  • AKAM

Editorial board

Dr.Ralf Kittelberger

  • Compliance management systems
  • Corporate governance and supervisory board duties
  • Employment law and HR compliance
  • AI in legal work and legal operations
  • Company and commercial law
  • HfWU Nürtingen-Geislingen
  • TU Darmstadt
  • Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen
  • Fortbildungsinstitut der Rechtsanwaltskammer Stuttgart

Editorial board

Dr.Florian Kollberg

  • AI risk management in regulated finance
  • Model risk and validation
  • Financial regulation and FINMA requirements
  • ESG reporting and sustainable supply chains
  • Corporate finance, M&A and company valuation
  • HfWU Nürtingen-Geislingen

Editorial board

Dr.Wojtek StrickerM.Sc.

  • AI in company valuation
  • Corporate finance and investment cases
  • KPI and controlling systems
  • Group steering and strategic controlling
  • Renewable energy finance
  • Signum Magnum College
  • FernUniversität in Hagen
  • Frankfurt School of Finance & Management
  • Corporate Finance Institute

Editorial board

Prof. Dr.Svetlana Andjelic

  • Computer adaptive testing
  • Assessment design and measurement
  • Database systems and data modelling
  • Software architecture and domain-driven design
  • Education technology
  • Singidunum University Belgrade
  • Union University
  • FON, University of Belgrade
  • ITS Belgrade
  • Faculty of Computer Science Banja Luka

Editorial board

Prof. Dr.Nenad Dedić

  • Applied cryptography
  • Cloud and data security
  • Software supply-chain security
  • Secure AI architecture and deployment
  • Distributed systems
  • Boston University

Editorial board

Prof. Dr.José Machado

  • Industrial automation and robotics
  • Control systems and mechatronics
  • Industrial systems modelling and simulation
  • Industrial digitalisation and Industry 4.0
  • Manufacturing systems engineering
  • University of Minho (MEtRICs Research Center)
  • École Normale Supérieure de Cachan

Editorial board

Prof. Dr.Šemsudin Plojović

  • Applied statistics
  • Management information systems
  • Knowledge management and e-business
  • Innovation ecosystems and entrepreneurship
  • University of Novi Pazar

Editorial board

Prof. Dr.Ivica Stankovic

  • Quantitative risk modelling
  • Model risk management and validation
  • AI governance in financial institutions
  • Market and credit risk analytics
  • University College Dublin
  • University of Belgrade

Editorial board

Prof. Dr.Enes Sukic

  • Information systems and service architecture
  • Scholarly publishing and peer review
  • Research methodology and reporting
  • Management of technology
  • FITI Belgrad (Univ. Union-Nikola Tesla)
  • University of Niš
  • University of the Balearic Islands

For readers and libraries

Terms of publication

These publication terms apply to every article and form the journal record used by libraries, indexes and funders.

ISSN
3043-1921
Key title
Swissi AI journal
Abbreviated key title
Swissi AI j.
Publisher
Swissi Holding AG, Zug, Switzerland
Editor-in-chief
Dr. Walter Kurz, MBA, M.Sc.
Publication model
Continuous publication. Each article receives an article number.
Review
Manuscripts selected for peer review are assessed double-blind by at least 2 independent specialists from outside the editorial team. Peer review is completed within 4 weeks of submission. Review is double-blind: author and reviewer identities are withheld from each other.
Access
Open access. Full text is available from publication.
Charges
Submission and reading are free. A single CHF 450 charge applies when a manuscript proceeds to external peer review.
Licence
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International. Authors keep copyright.
Preservation
Every article is deposited with Zenodo, operated by CERN.
Listed in
ROAD, the ISSN International Centre's directory of open access scholarly resources. The ISSN Portal record is public in full, and the ISSN was assigned by the ISSN Centre Switzerland at the Swiss National Library.
Language
Articles are published in English with a German HTML reading version. The English text is the version of record, and each article PDF is published in English. Manuscripts are accepted in English or German.

Editorial standard

What the editors read for

Every submission is assessed against six criteria, including reproductions and negative results.

MethodReproducible from what is written
The method identifies the data and provenance, model, training and inference settings, and the decisions needed to reproduce the work.
EvaluationBaselines, conditions and failures
The evaluation reports baselines, ablations, operating conditions, failures and the setup behind each central result.
ClaimsConclusions stay within the evidence
A benchmark result is reported as a benchmark result, and a claim about behaviour in service rests on measurements from service.
Prior workWhat it stands on, and what it adds
The article states the literature it stands on and what it adds to it. Where a finding contradicts published work, it engages with that work directly.
Systems in serviceDeployed systems, as they behave
Reports on deployed systems state operating conditions, observed behaviour, measured effects and failures.
Reproduction and negative resultsFull editorial weight under the stated criteria
Reproductions, refutations and negative results carry full editorial weight when the method and evaluation meet the journal's criteria.

Scientific integrity

The journal applies these standards.

Kodex Wissenschaftliche Integrität

Swissuniversities, the Swiss National Science Foundation and Innosuisse drew up a code of conduct for scientific integrity together, under the lead of the Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences.

PDF (DE)akademien-schweiz.ch

1.00 MB · 4 May 2021

© 2021 Akademien der Wissenschaften Schweiz. Open-access publication under CC BY 4.0, source doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4707584.

Recent Daily Papers

From Hugging Face

Hugging Face

Hugging Face Daily Papers

ActionOPD: Distilling Decisions, Not Tokens

Distilling capable language-model agents into smaller models requires aligning the student's behavior with the teacher's. This raises a fundamental question: at which states and at what granularity should this alignment be performed? Offline imitation provides dense but token-specific supervision and can suffer...

Hugging Face

Hugging Face Daily Papers

KV4-RL: Unlocking Faster Asynchronous Rollouts for RLVR with INT4 KV Cache Quantization

Asynchronous rollout improves the efficiency of reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) by reducing under-utilization during long-tail generation. Sustained concurrency also concentrates context processing into fewer decode steps, increasing the KV workload per step. We characterize this KV...

Hugging Face

Hugging Face Daily Papers

MimicX: Policy-in-the-Loop Supervision Refinement for Video-Driven Humanoid Motion Tracking

Human videos provide rich motion targets for humanoid learning, yet visually plausible references can still produce persistent failures under physics-based execution. These failures reveal where training supervision should change. We present MimicX, a policy-in-the-loop framework that uses execution feedback to...

Hugging Face

Hugging Face Daily Papers

TextVerifier: Seeing Beyond Recognition to Verify Chinese Text Rendering

Text-to-image models increasingly generate readable Chinese text that still contains local rendering defects, such as a character with an extra or missing stroke or a malformed component. Such errors are invisible to OCR and vision-language models, which are trained for recognition and are therefore invariant to...

Hugging Face

Hugging Face Daily Papers

Efficient Scene-Text Refinement via Pixel-Space Grouped Image Generation

Generated images often have coherent layouts and visual content, yet local errors in small text and complex characters still limit their readability and practical use. Scene-text refinement requires accuracy, preservation, and efficiency. Existing methods based on variational autoencoders (VAEs) can lose fine...

Hugging Face

Hugging Face Daily Papers

What Makes a Social Agent's Interactions Effective? Learning from Verifiable Outcomes in Paired Worlds

Effective social interaction requires more than fluent responses: agents must reach plans that fit the participants' needs and circumstances. Existing evaluations of social agents mainly rely on LLM judges that rate the conversation, without checking the resulting plan. We introduce HICO-Bench, a benchmark of 180...

Hugging Face

Hugging Face Daily Papers

Diff Diffusion: Predicting Edit Paths with Diffusion Models for Efficient Code Editing

Diffusion large language models (dLLMs) are appealing for code generation because they can update many tokens in parallel, yet many are optimized for sequence synthesis rather than edit prediction. This setting is poorly matched to modern AI-assisted IDEs, where edit prediction must infer the next code change from...

Hugging Face

Hugging Face Daily Papers

Physical Time as a Missing Dimension of Robot Policy Memory Dynamics

Existing robot policy memories typically evolve with observation sequences, implicitly treating each update as the same amount of physical time. Yet identical observation histories can span different durations and require different actions, exposing physical time as a missing dimension of policy memory. We...

Hugging Face

Hugging Face Daily Papers

Hybrid Reasoning Agents

How can we build an agent that thinks beyond human language, yet still acts through it in the external environment? Modern LLM agents still reason and interact through text, while latent reasoning offers an efficient internal medium but lacks native tool access and reasoning transparency. We bridge these two...

Hugging Face

Hugging Face Daily Papers

Player-1: Learning to Play from Synthetic Experience

Computer-use agents have demonstrated strong capabilities in interpreting screens and executing keyboard and mouse actions. However, games, with their visually rich worlds and diverse mechanics, remain challenging and offer a demanding next step toward general digital control. Current game-agent learning pipelines...

Hugging Face

Hugging Face Daily Papers

G^3VLA: Geometric Inductive Bias for Vision-Language-Action Models

Vision-language-action (VLA) models have rapidly advanced generalist robot manipulation by harnessing the semantic knowledge of pretrained vision-language backbones. However, their visual representations are typically grounded in 2D image coordinates rather than calibrated camera geometry. This limitation is...

Hugging Face

Hugging Face Daily Papers

Diagnosing and Correcting Reward Hacking in Verifiable Instruction Following

Verifiable instruction-following benchmarks emphasize output-constraint satisfaction but can overlook whether responses meaningfully answer the underlying request, creating an evaluation blind spot. We show that frontier models can receive full credit for responses with little substantive answer content. Using the...

Hugging Face

Hugging Face Daily Papers

Doc2Harness: Benchmarking LLMs on Long-Horizon Harness Engineering of Coding Agents

Agents driven by large language models are increasingly deployed on long-horizon tasks, where they use tools and modify real workspaces. How well they perform depends as much on the harness around the model as on the model itself. Existing benchmarks measure downstream task success under a fixed harness, leaving...

Hugging Face

Hugging Face Daily Papers

Are We Testing Too Much? A Survey of Benchmark Compression for Efficient Evaluation of Large Language Models

Benchmarks are essential for evaluating and improving large language models (LLMs). Yet many widely used benchmarks are redundant, making evaluation unnecessarily expensive. Benchmark compression lowers this cost by estimating full-benchmark scores and rankings from a partial evaluation. Research in this area has...

Hugging Face

Hugging Face Daily Papers

Towards Agentic Robots: Model, Data, Environment, and Harness

Foundation models are driving a paradigm shift in robotic intelligence, moving beyond low-level action prediction to goal-directed orchestration of data collection, model training, task planning, and real-world execution. We characterize this emerging paradigm as an agentic robots, in which agents reason over human...

Hugging Face

Hugging Face Daily Papers

More Methods, Better Agents? A Reality Check on Self-Distillation in Agentic Reinforcement Learning

Self-distillation in agentic reinforcement learning has produced a growing number of methods. However, existing evaluations often reuse published baseline scores under differing experimental conditions, provide few direct comparisons among contemporaneous methods, and give limited attention to training stability...

Hugging Face

Hugging Face Daily Papers

Long-Horizon RL Needs Muon

Long-horizon agents must coordinate reasoning, tool use, and environment feedback over extended interactions. Learning from sparse outcome rewards requires weighting trajectories of different lengths and updating the policy while rollouts are still being collected. We examine a single-rollout asynchronous recipe...

Hugging Face

Hugging Face Daily Papers

Seeing, Maintaining, and Learning: The Evolution of Multimodal Agent Memory

Multimodal models and agents have emerged to enable AI systems to learn from and interact with the real world more like humans by integrating information across multiple modalities. However, enabling multimodal agents to continually acquire useful information from complex, heterogeneous multimodal data remains a...

Hugging Face

Hugging Face Daily Papers

MA-Bench: Measuring Operational Planning in Language Models

How well can a language model turn a large, incomplete and partly contradictory body of documents into a plan when no single correct answer exists? We introduce Mission Analysis (MA)-Bench, built on mission analysis, the first step of military operational planning, in which a staff reads the full situation and...

Hugging Face

Hugging Face Daily Papers

Beyond Domain-Routed Supervision: Cross-Teacher Guarding for Multi-Teacher On-Policy Distillation

Multi-teacher on-policy distillation (MOPD) extends on-policy distillation (OPD) by routing domain-specific data to specialized teachers, integrating their capabilities through dense token-level supervision on student-generated trajectories. However, domain routing only distinguishes the supervision sources for...

This site stores functional cookies for language, consent and regional routing, plus the theme in browser storage. Choose your cookie setting. Privacy policy